Me again, I just wanted to ask you what is the most effective way of using the CS rankings. Do you think the regressed CS rankings are more accurate, or do you think the raw projections provide more information?
I did a transfer of Wilkinson to Hughes to avoid the 0.1 drop and I'm hoping that it wasn't a silly move, especially since Stoke are projected to "most likely" have a CS.
1 comment:
Hi Chris,
Me again, I just wanted to ask you what is the most effective way of using the CS rankings. Do you think the regressed CS rankings are more accurate, or do you think the raw projections provide more information?
I did a transfer of Wilkinson to Hughes to avoid the 0.1 drop and I'm hoping that it wasn't a silly move, especially since Stoke are projected to "most likely" have a CS.
Post a Comment